MR.S.Sakkaravarthi Dr.Sridevi, M.KAVITHA DEVAKIRUBAI,T.Chandran,S.Yuvaraj-MS/612/2006,P.SENTHILKUMAR vs The Commissioner, — WP/13616/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWAL on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010789902026

Filing Number

WP/58301/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/13616/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Coram

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Local Authorities ( 103 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWAL

Last updated 22-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MR.S.Sakkaravarthi Dr.Sridevi, M.KAVITHA DEVAKIRUBAI,T.Chandran,S.Yuvaraj-MS/612/2006,P.SENTHILKUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Commissioner,

  2. 2.The Member Secretary,

  3. 3.The Executive Engineer,

  4. 4.MR.S.Santhanam

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Honourable The Chief JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul MuruganView PDF

    The Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by S. Sakkaravarthi seeking a mandamus to direct the Kancheepuram City Municipal Corporation and other authorities to inspect a property and take action against unauthorized construction by the 4th respondent. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's counsel requesting leave to withdraw, with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/13616/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by S. Sakkaravarthi seeking a mandamus to direct the Kancheepuram City Municipal Corporation and other authorities to inspect a property and take action against unauthorized construction by the 4th respondent. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's counsel requesting leave to withdraw, with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case