R. Sairam vs THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR — WP/20481/2026
Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA010771882026
Filing Number
WP/56941/2026
Filing Date
30-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/20481/2026
Registration Date
22-May-2026
Judge
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
Coram
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
Public Interest Litigation ( 128 )
Sub-Category
Other PIL Matters ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Decision Date
08-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.R. Sairam
Adv. S.Bala Subramaniam,Thenmozhi,Thenmozhi, K. Vishnu Karthick,Abul Faiz .M,Thenmozhi
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
-
2.The Block Development Officer,
-
3.The Thasildhar,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable The Chief JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul MuruganView PDF
The Madras High Court disposed of R. Sairam's petition seeking measurement and demarcation of burial ground lands in Survey Nos. 122 and 124, fencing, and road construction in Ayyur Agaram Village. After the Revenue Inspector submitted a report on 13.03.2026 without final decision, the Court directed respondent authorities to decide the petitioner's representation expeditiously within two months, without expressing any opinion on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
For Admission
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
-
30-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/20481/2026
The Madras High Court disposed of R. Sairam's petition seeking measurement and demarcation of burial ground lands in Survey Nos. 122 and 124, fencing, and road construction in Ayyur Agaram Village. After the Revenue Inspector submitted a report on 13.03.2026 without final decision, the Court directed respondent authorities to decide the petitioner's representation expeditiously within two months, without expressing any opinion on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts