Vijaybalaji Fabs Represented by its Partner MR.M.Balasubramaniam Rajkumar P, SAMUEL RUPESH RAJKUMAR,V.MOHAN,C.SIVASUBRAMANIAN vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) Tiruppur Rural 2 Assessment Circle, — WP/17796/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010771202026

e-Filing Number

28-03-2026

Filing Number

WP/56892/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/17796/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vijaybalaji Fabs Represented by its Partner MR.M.Balasubramaniam Rajkumar P, SAMUEL RUPESH RAJKUMAR,V.MOHAN,C.SIVASUBRAMANIAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) Tiruppur Rural 2 Assessment Circle,

  2. 2.The Manager Karur Vysya Bank

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 17796/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST assessment order dated 17.11.2025 passed against Vijaybalaji Fabs, finding the petitioner lacked reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits after the authority confirmed the tax proposal without considering the petitioner's non-participation. The court directed the tax authority to provide a fresh opportunity for the petitioner to file a reply within 15 days and conduct a personal hearing before issuing a fresh assessment order within three months, noting that approximately 90% of disputed tax dues had already been recovered through bank account attachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/17796/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 17796/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST assessment order dated 17.11.2025 passed against Vijaybalaji Fabs, finding the petitioner lacked reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits after the authority confirmed the tax proposal without considering the petitioner's non-participation. The court directed the tax authority to provide a fresh opportunity for the petitioner to file a reply within 15 days and conduct a personal hearing before issuing a fresh assessment order within three months, noting that approximately 90% of disputed tax dues had already been recovered through bank account attachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case