Tea Board of India, K RAMANAMOORTHY vs Parry Agro Industries Ltd.,(Carolyn Estate) Advocate - Roshan Balasubramanian, FOR CAVEATORS FOR R1,M.P.PRANAAV,V.SRINITHI MALAVIKA — CMP/9914/2026

Case under U/s 5 Limitation Act Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DELAY CONDONED on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010740782026

Filing Number

CMP/54628/2026

Filing Date

26-Mar-2026

Registration No

CMP/9914/2026

Registration Date

15-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Coram

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

General Miscellaneous ( 78 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DELAY CONDONED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 5 Limitation Act Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Tea Board of India, K RAMANAMOORTHY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Parry Agro Industries Ltd.,(Carolyn Estate) Advocate - Roshan Balasubramanian, FOR CAVEATORS FOR R1,M.P.PRANAAV,V.SRINITHI MALAVIKA

  2. 2.Union of India,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    —View PDF

    Case Summary: CMP No. 9914/2026 The Madras High Court allowed the Tea Board of India's application to condone a 59-day delay in filing an appeal against Parry Agro Industries Ltd. The court, satisfied with the reasons provided in the affidavit, granted the condonation and directed the registry to number the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Miscellaneous Petitions

    Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/9914/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMP No. 9914/2026 The Madras High Court allowed the Tea Board of India's application to condone a 59-day delay in filing an appeal against Parry Agro Industries Ltd. The court, satisfied with the reasons provided in the affidavit, granted the condonation and directed the registry to number the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case