Rajendran Subbarayan GUNASEELAN S, A.SANJAY,R.TAMIZHARASAN,S.SIVASANKARI,G.SHAKTHIPRIYA,G.LOKESHWARAN,N.MARUTHACHALAMOORTHY,SUJATHA GUNASEELAN vs The Deputy Commissioner GT — WP/19055/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010738762026

e-Filing Number

25-03-2026

Filing Number

WP/54532/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/19055/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajendran Subbarayan GUNASEELAN S, A.SANJAY,R.TAMIZHARASAN,S.SIVASANKARI,G.SHAKTHIPRIYA,G.LOKESHWARAN,N.MARUTHACHALAMOORTHY,SUJATHA GUNASEELAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Deputy Commissioner GT

  2. 2.Commercial Tax Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    The Madras High Court set aside a tax order dated 01.12.2025 issued against Shree Sharadambal Spinners for FY 2020-21, finding it was issued without hearing the petitioner, violating natural justice. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration with a fresh opportunity to be heard, conditional on the petitioner remitting an additional 15% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days, with a final decision to be issued within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19055/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court set aside a tax order dated 01.12.2025 issued against Shree Sharadambal Spinners for FY 2020-21, finding it was issued without hearing the petitioner, violating natural justice. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration with a fresh opportunity to be heard, conditional on the petitioner remitting an additional 15% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days, with a final decision to be issued within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case