S.M.GOVINDASAMY vs THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR — WP/13069/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010736102026

Filing Number

WP/54344/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/13069/2026

Registration Date

01-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Coram

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Public Interest Litigation ( 128 )

Sub-Category

Un-authorized Constructions ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 22-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.M.GOVINDASAMY

    Adv. P.Kumaravel

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

  2. 2.The Commissioner of Erode Coroporation,

  3. 3.The District Revenue Officer,

  4. 4.The Assistant Director,

  5. 5.The Executive Engineer

  6. 6.The Proprietor

  7. 7.The Proprietor,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Honourable The Chief JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul MuruganView PDF

    The Madras High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the competent authority to decide the petitioner's pending representation (dated 29.01.2025) on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. The court accepted the State counsel's submission and clarified that it expressed no opinion on the case's merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/13069/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the competent authority to decide the petitioner's pending representation (dated 29.01.2025) on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. The court accepted the State counsel's submission and clarified that it expressed no opinion on the case's merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case