KS International Re by its Proprietor Kamaal Khan Adithya Reddy, DHANESH,PRANAV DEVARAJ,RAGHUNANDAN SRIRAM,Vaani Sreekant Iyer vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST) — WP/18499/2026
Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 05th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA010734062026
e-Filing Number
25-03-2026
Filing Number
WP/54179/2026
Filing Date
25-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/18499/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Tax/Tolls ( 150 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Decision Date
05-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KS International Re by its Proprietor Kamaal Khan Adithya Reddy, DHANESH,PRANAV DEVARAJ,RAGHUNANDAN SRIRAM,Vaani Sreekant Iyer
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Assistant Commissioner (ST)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF
Case Summary: WP No. 18499/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST assessment order dated 02.12.2025 issued by the Assistant Commissioner (ST) against K.S. International, finding it violated natural justice principles as the tax authority confirmed the tax proposal without the taxpayer responding to show cause notices or attending the personal hearing. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remit 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the authority must issue a fresh order within three months following a reasonable opportunity of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
For Admission
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
-
25-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/18499/2026
Case Summary: WP No. 18499/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST assessment order dated 02.12.2025 issued by the Assistant Commissioner (ST) against K.S. International, finding it violated natural justice principles as the tax authority confirmed the tax proposal without the taxpayer responding to show cause notices or attending the personal hearing. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remit 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the authority must issue a fresh order within three months following a reasonable opportunity of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts