M/s. Apollo Specialty Hospitals Private Limited PRASAD N., V.Aravindan,V.G.Vijay Raj,C.Subramanian,KA.Parthasarathy vs The State Tax Officer — WP/18907/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010723202026

e-Filing Number

18-03-2026

Filing Number

WP/53285/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/18907/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s. Apollo Specialty Hospitals Private Limited PRASAD N., V.Aravindan,V.G.Vijay Raj,C.Subramanian,KA.Parthasarathy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Tax Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 18907/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST assessment order dated 20.11.2025 against Apollo Specialty Hospitals, finding procedural violations. The court held that the tax officer failed to consider documents submitted by the petitioner (including those emailed to the previous officer) and violated Section 75(4) of the GST statute by not granting a personal hearing. The matter was remanded for fresh reconsideration within three months, with the hospital to receive a reasonable opportunity for hearing, particularly regarding its claim that it provides exempt services. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/18907/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 18907/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST assessment order dated 20.11.2025 against Apollo Specialty Hospitals, finding procedural violations. The court held that the tax officer failed to consider documents submitted by the petitioner (including those emailed to the previous officer) and violated Section 75(4) of the GST statute by not granting a personal hearing. The matter was remanded for fresh reconsideration within three months, with the hospital to receive a reasonable opportunity for hearing, particularly regarding its claim that it provides exempt services. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case