S.Arumugam R.Krishnaswamy, G.Vivekanandan vs V.Siddan @ Siddaiah Thevar — WMP/14433/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: --ORDERED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010721262026

Filing Number

WMP/53180/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

WMP/14433/2026

Registration Date

01-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice M.dhandapani

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice M.dhandapani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

General Miscellaneous ( 78 )

Sub-Category

Senior Citizen Maintenance Act ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ORDERED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.Arumugam R.Krishnaswamy, G.Vivekanandan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.V.Siddan @ Siddaiah Thevar

  2. 2.The Revenue Divisional officer

  3. 3.The sub-Registrar

  4. 4.Dilliraja

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice M.dhandapaniView PDF

    The Madras High Court granted petitioner S. Arumugam's miscellaneous petition to record the death of first respondent V.Siddan @ Siddaiah Thevar (who died on 14.11.2024) and recognized the petitioner as a legal representative of the deceased. The court also added Dilliraja, the other son of the deceased, as the fourth respondent through substitution, and directed the registry to amend the underlying writ petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Adjourned Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WMP/14433/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court granted petitioner S. Arumugam's miscellaneous petition to record the death of first respondent V.Siddan @ Siddaiah Thevar (who died on 14.11.2024) and recognized the petitioner as a legal representative of the deceased. The court also added Dilliraja, the other son of the deceased, as the fourth respondent through substitution, and directed the registry to amend the underlying writ petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case