Arc International Fertility and Research Centre Private Limited M/S.AAV PARTNERS vs Typewriter and Office Appliances India Co Pvt Ltd — A/1489/2026

Case under Tamil Nadu Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 Section OrderVRule1. Disposed: Contested--DELAY CONDONED on 01st June 2026.

CNR: HCMA010709452026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

14-08-2025

Filing Number

A/52237/2026

Filing Date

14-08-2025

Registration No

A/1489/2026

Registration Date

24-03-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice K.KUMARESH BABU

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice K.KUMARESH BABU

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

ORIGINALSECTION

Decision Date

01st June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DELAY CONDONED

Acts & Sections

Tamil Nadu Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 Section OrderVRule1

Petitioner(s)

Arc International Fertility and Research Centre Private Limited M/S.AAV PARTNERS

Respondent(s)

Typewriter and Office Appliances India Co Pvt Ltd

Vishnu Phadke

Hearing History

Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice K.KUMARESH BABU

01-06-2026

APPLICATION IN CIVIL SUITS

Orders

01-06-2026
Honourable Mr.Justice K.KUMARESH BABU

The court granted the respondents' application to condone an 84-day delay in filing their written statement in the commercial suit. The judge found the reasons provided in the supporting affidavit satisfactory and noted that the petitioner's counsel had no objection, thereby allowing the application as requested and directing the registry to file the written statement on record if procedurally proper. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the respondents' application to condone an 84-day delay in filing their written statement in the commercial suit. The judge found the reasons provided in the supporting affidavit satisfactory and noted that the petitioner's counsel had no objection, thereby allowing the application as requested and directing the registry to file the written statement on record if procedurally proper. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case