Airports Authority of India M/s.K.K.Sivasshanmugam, K.S.SRI GIRI PRASATH vs M/s. Bhadra International (India) Pvt. Ltd., — EP/67/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section section 39. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

CNR: HCMA010703042022

Filing Number

EP/49943/2022

Filing Date

29-Apr-2022

Registration No

EP/67/2022

Registration Date

08-Aug-2022

Judge

Master

Coram

Master

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

ORIGINALSECTION

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section section 39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Airports Authority of India M/s.K.K.Sivasshanmugam, K.S.SRI GIRI PRASATH

  2. 2.The Chairman,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/s. Bhadra International (India) Pvt. Ltd.,

    Adv. N.VIJAYAKUMAR,COUNTER AFFIDAVIT FILED, D.NO:11544 DT 12/04/2023 1123

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    For Orders

    Master

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    MasterView PDF

    Summary: The execution petition (E.P. No. 67 of 2022) was allowed. The court ordered attachment of two EEFC bank accounts of the judgment debtor held with Punjab National Bank, New Delhi, to recover Rs. 20,28,37,461/- plus 18% interest per annum as per the arbitrator's final award dated 06.08.2019. A pro-order was issued to the bank, returnable by 19.06.2026, rejecting the debtor's contention that pending Special Leave Petition could stay execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Execution Petitions

    Master

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Execution Petitions

    Master

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Execution Petitions

    Master

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Execution Petitions

    Master

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Execution Petitions

    Master

  9. 28-Jan-2026

    Execution Petitions

    Master

  10. 09-Jan-2026

    = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

    Master

  11. 05-Dec-2025

    For Arguments

    Master

  12. 30-Oct-2025

    For Arguments

    Master

  13. 15-Oct-2025

    For Arguments

    Master

  14. 08-Sep-2025

    For Arguments

    Master

  15. 21-Aug-2025

    For Arguments

    Master

  16. 06-Aug-2025

    For Arguments

    Master

  17. 18-Jul-2025

    Execution Petitions

    Master

  18. 04-Jul-2025

    Execution Petitions

    Master

  19. 27-Jun-2025

    For Enquiry

    Master

  20. 06-Jun-2025

    For Enquiry

    Master

  21. 12-Feb-2025

    Execution Petitions

    Master

  22. 03-Jan-2025

    Execution Petitions

    Master

  23. 06-Dec-2024

    Execution Petitions

    Master

  24. 10-Apr-2024

    Execution Petitions

    Master

  25. 05-Apr-2024

    Execution Petitions

    Master

  26. 24-Jan-2024

    For Orders

    Master

  27. 08-Sep-2023

    For Enquiry

    Master

  28. 09-Aug-2023

    For Enquiry

    Master

  29. 26-Jul-2023

    For Enquiry

    Master

  30. 02-Jun-2023

    Execution Petitions

    Master

  31. 12-Apr-2023

    Execution Petitions

    Master

  32. 17-Mar-2023

    Execution Petitions

    Master

  33. 22-Feb-2023

    Execution Petitions

    Master

  34. 27-Jan-2023

    Execution Petitions

    Master

  35. 15-Dec-2022

    Service/Ep Cases

    Assistant Registrar I (Os)

  36. 01-Dec-2022

    Service/Ep Cases

    Assistant Registrar I (Os)

  37. 10-Nov-2022

    Service/Ep Cases

    Assistant Registrar I (Os)

  38. 13-Oct-2022

    Service/Ep Cases

    Assistant Registrar I (Os)

  39. 15-Sep-2022

    Service/Ep Cases

    Assistant Registrar I (Os)

  40. 18-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 29-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. EP/67/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The execution petition (E.P. No. 67 of 2022) was allowed. The court ordered attachment of two EEFC bank accounts of the judgment debtor held with Punjab National Bank, New Delhi, to recover Rs. 20,28,37,461/- plus 18% interest per annum as per the arbitrator's final award dated 06.08.2019. A pro-order was issued to the bank, returnable by 19.06.2026, rejecting the debtor's contention that pending Special Leave Petition could stay execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case