S.Balasubramaniam 1.Usha Balasubramanian and another M/S. K.M. VIJAYAN ASSOCIATES vs NIL — A/1926/2026

Case under Tamil Nadu Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 Section 1. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCMA010672882026

Filing Number

A/49515/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

A/1926/2026

Registration Date

22-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Dr.Justice A.d.maria Clete

Coram

Honourable Dr.Justice A.d.maria Clete

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

ORIGINALSECTION

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Tamil Nadu Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.Balasubramaniam 1.Usha Balasubramanian and another M/S. K.M. VIJAYAN ASSOCIATES

  2. 2.Sangeetha Balasubramanian

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NIL

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Honourable Dr.Justice A.d.maria CleteView PDF

    Case Summary: A/1926/2026 Outcome: Application Dismissed with Directions The Madras High Court dismissed the applicants' plea to restore an Original Petition (seeking Letters of Administration with Will annexed) that was dismissed for default on 19.12.2023. The court found the application was filed under the wrong CPC provision (Order IX Rule 7 instead of Rule 9) and was filed beyond the limitation period without condonation of delay. The court directed applicants to file a fresh application under Order IX Rule 9 CPC with a condonation of delay petition, and posted the matter to 03.07.2026 for compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Applications In Op

    Honourable Dr.Justice A.d.maria Clete

  4. 17-Jun-2026

    For Orders

    Honourable Dr.Justice A.d.maria Clete

  5. 15-Jun-2026

    Applications In Op

    Honourable Dr.Justice A.d.maria Clete

  6. 28-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A/1926/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: A/1926/2026 Outcome: Application Dismissed with Directions The Madras High Court dismissed the applicants' plea to restore an Original Petition (seeking Letters of Administration with Will annexed) that was dismissed for default on 19.12.2023. The court found the application was filed under the wrong CPC provision (Order IX Rule 7 instead of Rule 9) and was filed beyond the limitation period without condonation of delay. The court directed applicants to file a fresh application under Order IX Rule 9 CPC with a condonation of delay petition, and posted the matter to 03.07.2026 for compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case