Tvl Om Swasthik Automobiles Adithya Reddy, VAANI SREEKANT IYER ,RGHUNANDAN SRIRAM ,PRANAV DEVARAJ ,N.Dhanesh Kumar vs The Depufy State Tax Officer 1 (ST) — WP/17923/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010669222026

e-Filing Number

14-03-2026

Filing Number

WP/49290/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/17923/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Tvl Om Swasthik Automobiles Adithya Reddy, VAANI SREEKANT IYER ,RGHUNANDAN SRIRAM ,PRANAV DEVARAJ ,N.Dhanesh Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Depufy State Tax Officer 1 (ST)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Summary of WP No. 17923/2026 The Madras High Court set aside the appellate authority's rejection of Tvl. Om Swasthik Automobiles' appeal against a GST order dated 19.09.2025. The court found that while the appeal was filed within the condonable period, it was wrongly rejected solely on grounds of non-filing a delay condonation petition. The matter was remanded to the appellate authority for reconsideration, subject to the petitioner filing a petition to condone the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/17923/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP No. 17923/2026 The Madras High Court set aside the appellate authority's rejection of Tvl. Om Swasthik Automobiles' appeal against a GST order dated 19.09.2025. The court found that while the appeal was filed within the condonable period, it was wrongly rejected solely on grounds of non-filing a delay condonation petition. The matter was remanded to the appellate authority for reconsideration, subject to the petitioner filing a petition to condone the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case