MR.J.VINOTH M/S.R.ASHRAF KHAN, S.K.P.DILIP BABU FOR PETITIONER vs MR.BHAJANDAS RAMCHAND HUF — CRP/885/2016
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA010655322016
Filing Number
CRP/16815/2016
Filing Date
01-Mar-2016
Registration No
CRP/885/2016
Registration Date
15-Mar-2016
Judge
Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu
Coram
Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu
Category
Civil Revision Petition ( 166 )
Sub-Category
S. 115 of CPC ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIALSECTION
Decision Date
05-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MR.J.VINOTH M/S.R.ASHRAF KHAN, S.K.P.DILIP BABU FOR PETITIONER
-
2.MR.A.JAYARAJ (DIED)
-
3.J. MALARKODI
-
4.J. GIFRINA
-
5.J.CHARLES BOSS
Respondent(s)
-
1.MR.BHAJANDAS RAMCHAND HUF
Adv. AOS NOT FILED ,-------------------,PRIVATE NOTICE ,DUE REG SOLE RESPONDENT ( IN BOTH CRPS) 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh BabuView PDF
-
29-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh BabuView PDF
Summary of CRP No. 885/2016 The High Court of Madras dismissed multiple consolidated revision petitions challenging the rejection of leave-to-defend applications in summary money recovery suits. Petitioners argued they had repaid loans and that blank promissory notes/cheques were never returned; they further claimed 36% interest violated the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Charging Exorbitant Interest Act. However, the court found no triable issues, noting petitioners had already admitted to executing the instruments and receiving funds in prior proceedings before a designated court under the exorbitant interest statute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
For Orders
Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu
-
24-Apr-2026
Date Case
Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu
-
16-Apr-2026
Date Case
Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu
-
02-Apr-2026
CRP - Cases
Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu
-
07-Jan-2022
Honourable Mr.Justice J.sathya Narayana PrasadView PDF
-
07-Jan-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Mar-2016
Case filed
Registration No. CRP/885/2016
Summary of CRP No. 885/2016 The High Court of Madras dismissed multiple consolidated revision petitions challenging the rejection of leave-to-defend applications in summary money recovery suits. Petitioners argued they had repaid loans and that blank promissory notes/cheques were never returned; they further claimed 36% interest violated the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Charging Exorbitant Interest Act. However, the court found no triable issues, noting petitioners had already admitted to executing the instruments and receiving funds in prior proceedings before a designated court under the exorbitant interest statute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts