The DGM (T) and Project Director vs The District Collector And Sole Arbitrator (LA) — CMP/13147/2026

Case under U/o Iv Rule 9(4) of as Rules Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DELAY CONDONED on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010645362026

Filing Number

CMP/47504/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

CMP/13147/2026

Registration Date

20-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan , Honourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan , Honourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi

Bench Type

Division Bench

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DELAY CONDONED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o Iv Rule 9(4) of as Rules Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The DGM (T) and Project Director

    Adv. S.Srinivasan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The District Collector And Sole Arbitrator (LA)

  2. 2.The Competent Authority and Special District Revenue Officer (LA)

  3. 3.R.Subramaniam

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice P. VELMURUGAN,Honourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan ThilakavadiView PDF

    The Madras High Court granted the petitioner's miscellaneous petition seeking condonation of a 450-day delay in re-presenting appeal papers in Arbitration Appeal SR.No.46950 of 2026. The court, satisfied with the affidavit's averments, condoned the delay and directed the Registry to number the appeal if otherwise in order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    To Condone Delay In Representation

    Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan , Honourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/13147/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court granted the petitioner's miscellaneous petition seeking condonation of a 450-day delay in re-presenting appeal papers in Arbitration Appeal SR.No.46950 of 2026. The court, satisfied with the affidavit's averments, condoned the delay and directed the Registry to number the appeal if otherwise in order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case