Patco Precision Components Private Limited Represented by its managing director Ravindra Patil M/S.BRIDGEHEAD LAW PARTNERS, PRANAV V SHANKAR vs Tapams Advanced Management and Industries Private Limited Represented by its managing director — A/1340/2026
Case under Tamil Nadu Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--DELAY CONDONED on 01st June 2026.
CNR: HCMA010630852026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
A/46450/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
A/1340/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr.Justice K.KUMARESH BABU
Coram
Honourable Mr.Justice K.KUMARESH BABU
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
ORIGINALSECTION
Decision Date
01st June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DELAY CONDONED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Patco Precision Components Private Limited Represented by its managing director Ravindra Patil M/S.BRIDGEHEAD LAW PARTNERS, PRANAV V SHANKAR
Respondent(s)
Tapams Advanced Management and Industries Private Limited Represented by its managing director
Hearing History
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice K.KUMARESH BABU
APPLICATION IN CIVIL SUITS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | APPLICATION IN CIVIL SUITS |
Orders
The court granted Patco Precision Components' application to condone a 39-day delay in filing the written statement in the commercial suit against Tapams Advanced Management and Industries. The judge, satisfied with the affidavit's averments and noting the respondent's counsel had no objection, approved the condonation and directed the registry to place the written statement on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted Patco Precision Components' application to condone a 39-day delay in filing the written statement in the commercial suit against Tapams Advanced Management and Industries. The judge, satisfied with the affidavit's averments and noting the respondent's counsel had no objection, approved the condonation and directed the registry to place the written statement on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts