Hannah Jayapriya vs Saravana Raja — OP/445/2021
Case under Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 Section 3, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 25. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA010627422021
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
OP/45644/2021
Filing Date
26-04-2021
Registration No
OP/445/2021
Registration Date
17-06-2021
Judge
MASTER
Coram
MASTER
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Children/Juvenile & Court of Wards ( 27 )
Sub-Category
Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 (8 of 1890) ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
ORIGINALSECTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hannah Jayapriya
Adv. J.Saravana Vel,P.Kalpana,P.Kalpana, B.S.AJEETHA,P.Kalpana
Respondent(s)
Saravana Raja
Adv. K.UDAYASELVI (2243/
,K.SIVA (4044/2021,CHANGE OF VAKALAT,FOR RESPT.(
- D.NO.20401/2022,[21/12, KACHAKESWARAR AGRAHARAM, ARMENIAN,ST, PARRYS, CH-1 (9841299304].,COUNTER & LIST OF DOCUMENTS FILED D.NO. 20718 DT: 11/08/2021 1123
Hearing History
Judge: MASTER
FOR RECORDING EVIDENCE
FOR RECORDING EVIDENCE
Revoked
GUARDIAN AND WARDS ACT CASES
EVIDENCE RECORDED CASES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | FOR RECORDING EVIDENCE |
| 10-03-2026 | FOR RECORDING EVIDENCE |
| 12-01-2026 | Revoked |
| 04-02-2025 | GUARDIAN AND WARDS ACT CASES |
| 14-02-2023 | EVIDENCE RECORDED CASES |
Orders
This document records the cross-examination of witness Ms. Hannah Jayapriya (P.W.1) in Application No. 4899 of 2024 before the High Court of Madras on 15.04.2026. The cross-examination by the respondent's counsel focused on challenging her credibility regarding allegations of physical abuse and the respondent's alleged bipolar disorder, highlighting inconsistencies such as lack of documentary evidence, missing postal slips for legal notices, and the presence of a renowned psychiatrist at their wedding. The witness denied most allegations raised during cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records the cross-examination of witness Ms. Hannah Jayapriya (P.W.1) in Application No. 4899 of 2024 before the High Court of Madras on 15.04.2026. The cross-examination by the respondent's counsel focused on challenging her credibility regarding allegations of physical abuse and the respondent's alleged bipolar disorder, highlighting inconsistencies such as lack of documentary evidence, missing postal slips for legal notices, and the presence of a renowned psychiatrist at their wedding. The witness denied most allegations raised during cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts