L.R.PALANISAMY vs THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER — WP/11140/2026
Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF WITH DIRECTION on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCMA010620692026
Filing Number
WP/45738/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/11140/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice M.dhandapani
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice M.dhandapani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Electricity ( 56 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF WITH DIRECTION
Last updated 22-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.L.R.PALANISAMY
Adv. K.Rajendran,A.RAJAPERUMAL,A.RAJAPERUMAL, B.SELVAVENKATA SUBRAMANIAN,M.THIRUMOORTHY,A.RAJAPERUMAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER
-
2.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
-
3.THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
-
4.THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr Justice M.dhandapaniView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr Justice M.dhandapaniView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr Justice M.dhandapaniView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr Justice M.dhandapaniView PDF
The Madras High Court disposed of the writ petition after TANGEDCO authorities committed to expeditiously issuing the remaining two agricultural electricity connections under the Fast Track scheme, following the petitioner's December 2025 payments. The court accepted the respondents' submission and closed the case, noting that one connection had already been effected per its earlier April 2026 order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
For Admission
Honourable Mr Justice M.dhandapani
-
18-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr Justice M.dhandapaniView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/11140/2026
The Madras High Court disposed of the writ petition after TANGEDCO authorities committed to expeditiously issuing the remaining two agricultural electricity connections under the Fast Track scheme, following the petitioner's December 2025 payments. The court accepted the respondents' submission and closed the case, noting that one connection had already been effected per its earlier April 2026 order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts