S.ELUMALAI N.BASKARAN, B.SATHYA,VANITHA,M.A.BALASUBRAMANIAN vs The Chairman/District Collector — WP/17085/2026
Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWAL on 01st June 2026.
CNR: HCMA010597662026
Filing Number
WP/44137/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/17085/2026
Registration Date
27-Apr-2026
Judge
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
Coram
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
Public Interest Litigation ( 128 )
Sub-Category
Relating to Mines and Minerals ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Decision Date
01-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWAL
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S.ELUMALAI N.BASKARAN, B.SATHYA,VANITHA,M.A.BALASUBRAMANIAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Chairman/District Collector
-
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
-
3.The Tahsildar
-
4.The Deputy Director
-
5.District Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority,
-
6.The District Environmental Engineer
-
7.S.Murali alias S.Raghuraman
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Jun-2026
Honourable The Chief JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul MuruganView PDF
Summary of WP No. 17085 of 2026 The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn on June 1, 2026. The petitioners had challenged stone quarry permits and pollution control certificates issued to the respondent, alleging the operations caused pollution and health hazards affecting agricultural activities. The court allowed withdrawal with liberty for the petitioners to submit a representation to competent authorities for grievance redressal, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Jun-2026
For Admission
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/17085/2026
Summary of WP No. 17085 of 2026 The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn on June 1, 2026. The petitioners had challenged stone quarry permits and pollution control certificates issued to the respondent, alleging the operations caused pollution and health hazards affecting agricultural activities. The court allowed withdrawal with liberty for the petitioners to submit a representation to competent authorities for grievance redressal, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts