Senthil M/S.T.SAI KRISHNAN, Yeshwanth Sharma P,R.K.Rithani,M.Velan,I.Inian vs The district collector — WP/10254/2026
Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 21st April 2026.
CNR: HCMA010577402026
Filing Number
WP/42694/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/10254/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice M.dhandapani
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice M.dhandapani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
General Miscellaneous ( 78 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CLOSED
Last updated 22-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Senthil M/S.T.SAI KRISHNAN, Yeshwanth Sharma P,R.K.Rithani,M.Velan,I.Inian
Respondent(s)
-
1.The district collector
Adv. R-2 THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, Chennai North Division, Chennai. 1123
-
2.The Sub Divisional Magistrate,
-
3.The Tahsildar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr Justice M.dhandapaniView PDF
Summary The Madras High Court disposed of the writ petition after the Tahsildar issued a Class-I Legal heirship certificate to the petitioner during the proceedings, thereby rendering the petition moot. The court closed the petition with no costs, finding that the relief sought had been substantially granted by the respondent authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
--------------------
Honourable Mr Justice M.dhandapani
-
15-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr Justice M.dhandapaniView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
--------------------
Honourable Mr Justice M.dhandapani
-
06-Apr-2026
For Admission
Honourable Mr Justice M.dhandapani
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/10254/2026
Summary The Madras High Court disposed of the writ petition after the Tahsildar issued a Class-I Legal heirship certificate to the petitioner during the proceedings, thereby rendering the petition moot. The court closed the petition with no costs, finding that the relief sought had been substantially granted by the respondent authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts