C.SUBRAMANIAN SARAVANAN, ANTHONYAMMAL,RATHNA KUPPUSAMY,CANNANE IRISSAPPANE vs THE AUTHORISED OFFICER — WP/17371/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWAL on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010577212026

Filing Number

WP/42680/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/17371/2026

Registration Date

27-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Coram

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Banking ( 15 )

Sub-Category

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, ( 33 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWAL

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.C.SUBRAMANIAN SARAVANAN, ANTHONYAMMAL,RATHNA KUPPUSAMY,CANNANE IRISSAPPANE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE AUTHORISED OFFICER

  2. 2.The Sub Registrar

  3. 3.The UT of Puducherry Rep. by

  4. 4.V.Rajaram

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Honourable The Chief JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul MuruganView PDF

    Summary: The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by C. Subramanian and others challenging a property sale by Union Bank of India's Asset Recovery Branch dated 16.10.2025, which allegedly lacked transparency and fairness. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the petition, and the court dismissed it as withdrawn with liberty to pursue appropriate remedies under law, without ordering costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/17371/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by C. Subramanian and others challenging a property sale by Union Bank of India's Asset Recovery Branch dated 16.10.2025, which allegedly lacked transparency and fairness. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the petition, and the court dismissed it as withdrawn with liberty to pursue appropriate remedies under law, without ordering costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case