The Principal vs C. Balasubramanian — CMP/6254/2026

Case under U/s 5 Limitation Act Section 1. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.

Next hearing 29-Apr-2026

CNR: HCMA010495612026

Filing Number

CMP/36666/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

CMP/6254/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Judge

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Coram

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Education ( 54 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Last updated 22-May-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 5 Limitation Act Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Principal

    Adv. M.Vaidhiyanathan,S. LOKAIAH,S. LOKAIAH, SHARANYA VAIDHIYANATHAN,U. GOWRISHANKAR,S. LOKAIAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.C. Balasubramanian

    Adv. S.SHANTHINI FOR SOLE RESPONDENT,P.M.HAMALATHA ,ANJANAA ARAVINDAN 1123

Case History

  1. 29-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Miscellaneous Petitions

    Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    —View PDF

    Summary The High Court of Madras allowed the condonation of delay application (CMP No.6254 of 2026) filed by Kendriya Vidyalaya to excuse a 121-day delay in filing the appeal. Despite the respondent's objection, the court accepted that the delay was due to official exigencies and procedural formalities. The Registry has been directed to number the appeal and list it for admission to proceed on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Honourable The Chief JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul MuruganView PDF

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/6254/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Madras allowed the condonation of delay application (CMP No.6254 of 2026) filed by Kendriya Vidyalaya to excuse a 121-day delay in filing the appeal. Despite the respondent's objection, the court accepted that the delay was due to official exigencies and procedural formalities. The Registry has been directed to number the appeal and list it for admission to proceed on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case