MR.MATHANA KUMAR AND ANOTHER M/S.B. Mohan, S.Bharanidharan-MS/4675/2021,P.Vetrivel-MS/3383/2021,B.M.SUBASH vs M/S TSR FILMS PRIVATE LIMITED — A/1708/2026
Case under Tamil Nadu Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 Section 1. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED WITH COSTS on 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA010467942026
Filing Number
A/34546/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
A/1708/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Honourable Dr.Justice A.d.maria Clete
Coram
Honourable Dr.Justice A.d.maria Clete
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
ORIGINALSECTION
Decision Date
08-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED WITH COSTS
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MR.MATHANA KUMAR AND ANOTHER M/S.B. Mohan, S.Bharanidharan-MS/4675/2021,P.Vetrivel-MS/3383/2021,B.M.SUBASH
-
2.Mr.Sathish Prabhu
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S TSR FILMS PRIVATE LIMITED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable Dr.Justice A.d.maria CleteView PDF
Case Summary: A/1708/2026 The Madras High Court allowed the defendants' application to set aside the ex-parte order and file their written statement in a defamation suit filed by TSR Films Private Limited regarding the film "Tik Tok," despite considerable delay. The court imposed Rs. 10,000 costs on the defendants and directed expeditious completion of cross-examination, recognizing that the dispute involves technical issues requiring merit-based adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
Application In CIVIL Suits
Honourable Dr.Justice A.d.maria Clete
-
15-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A/1708/2026
Case Summary: A/1708/2026 The Madras High Court allowed the defendants' application to set aside the ex-parte order and file their written statement in a defamation suit filed by TSR Films Private Limited regarding the film "Tik Tok," despite considerable delay. The court imposed Rs. 10,000 costs on the defendants and directed expeditious completion of cross-examination, recognizing that the dispute involves technical issues requiring merit-based adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts