The DGM (T) and Project Director Su.Srinivasan vs The District Collector and Sole Arbitrator (LA) — CMP/13521/2026
Case under U/s 149 of Cpc Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DELAY CONDONED on 05th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA010400032026
Filing Number
CMP/29556/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
CMP/13521/2026
Registration Date
02-06-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice P. VELMURUGAN , Honourable Mrs.Justice K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice P. VELMURUGAN , Honourable Mrs.Justice K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
Bench Type
Division Bench
Judicial Branch
JUDICIALSECTION
Decision Date
05th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DELAY CONDONED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The DGM (T) and Project Director Su.Srinivasan
Respondent(s)
The District Collector and Sole Arbitrator (LA)
The Competent Authority and
Ilamurugu
Hearing History
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice P. VELMURUGAN , Honourable Mrs.Justice K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
TO CONDONE DELAY IN DEFICIT COURT FEE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | TO CONDONE DELAY IN DEFICIT COURT FEE |
Orders
The Madras High Court granted the petitioner's miscellaneous petition to condone a delay of 597 days in paying the deficit court fee of Rs. 15,725 in an arbitration appeal. After hearing arguments from both sides and reviewing the supporting affidavit, the court was satisfied with the petitioner's explanations and allowed the delay to be overlooked. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Madras High Court granted the petitioner's miscellaneous petition to condone a delay of 597 days in paying the deficit court fee of Rs. 15,725 in an arbitration appeal. After hearing arguments from both sides and reviewing the supporting affidavit, the court was satisfied with the petitioner's explanations and allowed the delay to be overlooked. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts