DR.RAJESHWARI vs M/S.PNB HOUING FINANCE LIMITED — WMP/13882/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--ORDERED on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010323302026

Filing Number

WMP/23918/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

WMP/13882/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Coram

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Banking ( 15 )

Sub-Category

DRAT Orders ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ORDERED

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DR.RAJESHWARI

    Adv. Rajendraprasad K, M/S. M. ABISHEK ,G. BHARANIDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S.PNB HOUING FINANCE LIMITED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Honourable The Chief JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul MuruganView PDF

    Case Summary: WMP/13882/2026 The Madras High Court granted Dr. Rajeshwari a two-week extension to comply with its January 21, 2026 order requiring payment of Rs. 10 lakh to PNB Housing Finance Limited. The petitioner had prepared a demand draft on February 21, 2026 (after the original two-week deadline expired on February 2), but the bank rejected it; the court found the delay genuine due to the father's illness and hearing delays. The court emphasized no further extensions would be granted under any circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    For Extension Of Time

    Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WMP/13882/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WMP/13882/2026 The Madras High Court granted Dr. Rajeshwari a two-week extension to comply with its January 21, 2026 order requiring payment of Rs. 10 lakh to PNB Housing Finance Limited. The petitioner had prepared a demand draft on February 21, 2026 (after the original two-week deadline expired on February 2), but the bank rejected it; the court found the delay genuine due to the father's illness and hearing delays. The court emphasized no further extensions would be granted under any circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case