R.RAJKRISHNA M/S.U.KARUNAKARAN, v. sithannan,k.s.murali kumar,j. ranjithkumar,s. sibhiraj FOR PETITIONER ,addl typed set 1 filed by,m/s u.karunakaran vs V.BHARATHY — CRP/1598/2025

Case under U/a 227 Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCMA010281192025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CRP/19934/2025

Filing Date

07-02-2025

Registration No

CRP/1598/2025

Registration Date

09-04-2025

Judge

Honourable Mrs.Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI

Coram

Honourable Mrs.Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Civil Revision Petition ( 166 )

Sub-Category

Article 227 of the Constitution of India ( 44 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

U/a 227 Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

R.RAJKRISHNA M/S.U.KARUNAKARAN, v. sithannan,k.s.murali kumar,j. ranjithkumar,s. sibhiraj FOR PETITIONER ,addl typed set 1 filed by,m/s u.karunakaran

Respondent(s)

V.BHARATHY

Adv. PRIVATE NOTICE ,------------------,AOS NOT FILED ,v/r to m/s. N.R.RAJAGOPALAN-MS/215/1996 for sole respondent 1123

Hearing History

Judge: Honourable Mrs.Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI

17-04-2025

FOR ADMISSION (CRP)

22-08-2025

FOR ORDERS

13-08-2025

FOR ORDERS

06-08-2025

FOR ORDERS

30-07-2025

NOTICE OF MOTION - CRP CASES

Orders

15-04-2026
Honourable Mrs.Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI

The Madras High Court dismissed a civil revision petition filed by R. Rajkrishna challenging a Family Court order, after the petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal based on an out-of-court settlement between the parties. The court allowed the withdrawal with no costs awarded and closed the connected miscellaneous petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court dismissed a civil revision petition filed by R. Rajkrishna challenging a Family Court order, after the petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal based on an out-of-court settlement between the parties. The court allowed the withdrawal with no costs awarded and closed the connected miscellaneous petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case