R.RAJKRISHNA M/S.U.KARUNAKARAN, v. sithannan,k.s.murali kumar,j. ranjithkumar,s. sibhiraj FOR PETITIONER ,addl typed set 1 filed by,m/s u.karunakaran vs V.BHARATHY — CRP/1598/2025
Case under U/a 227 Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCMA010281192025
Filing Number
CRP/19934/2025
Filing Date
07-02-2025
Registration No
CRP/1598/2025
Registration Date
09-04-2025
Judge
Honourable Mrs.Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI
Coram
Honourable Mrs.Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Civil Revision Petition ( 166 )
Sub-Category
Article 227 of the Constitution of India ( 44 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIALSECTION
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--WITHDRAWN DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R.RAJKRISHNA M/S.U.KARUNAKARAN, v. sithannan,k.s.murali kumar,j. ranjithkumar,s. sibhiraj FOR PETITIONER ,addl typed set 1 filed by,m/s u.karunakaran
Respondent(s)
V.BHARATHY
Adv. PRIVATE NOTICE ,------------------,AOS NOT FILED ,v/r to m/s. N.R.RAJAGOPALAN-MS/215/1996 for sole respondent 1123
Hearing History
Judge: Honourable Mrs.Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI
FOR ADMISSION (CRP)
FOR ORDERS
FOR ORDERS
FOR ORDERS
NOTICE OF MOTION - CRP CASES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2025 | FOR ADMISSION (CRP) |
| 22-08-2025 | FOR ORDERS |
| 13-08-2025 | FOR ORDERS |
| 06-08-2025 | FOR ORDERS |
| 30-07-2025 | NOTICE OF MOTION - CRP CASES |
Orders
The Madras High Court dismissed a civil revision petition filed by R. Rajkrishna challenging a Family Court order, after the petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal based on an out-of-court settlement between the parties. The court allowed the withdrawal with no costs awarded and closed the connected miscellaneous petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Madras High Court dismissed a civil revision petition filed by R. Rajkrishna challenging a Family Court order, after the petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal based on an out-of-court settlement between the parties. The court allowed the withdrawal with no costs awarded and closed the connected miscellaneous petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts