SRI.M.MUTHUKARUPPAN M/S.V. Srimathi, ,Avinash Wadhwani vs TMT.P.L.ALAMELU AND 12 OTHERS — A/1069/2026
Case under Tamil Nadu Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 Section 1. Next hearing: 08th September 2026.
CNR: HCMA010223832026
Next Hearing
08th September 2026
Filing Number
A/16457/2026
Filing Date
29-01-2026
Registration No
A/1069/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Judge
Honourable Dr.Justice A.D.MARIA CLETE
Coram
Honourable Dr.Justice A.D.MARIA CLETE
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
ORIGINALSECTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SRI.M.MUTHUKARUPPAN M/S.V. Srimathi, ,Avinash Wadhwani
Respondent(s)
TMT.P.L.ALAMELU AND 12 OTHERS
RM. Arunachalam
M.Ravi
M.Palaniappan
R.Alagammai
State Bank of India
Bank of India
JAYA PRIYA CHIT FUNDS PRIVATE LIMITED
INNOART TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.,
GLOBAL INSTITUTE OF GAMING AND ANIMATION
Mr.B.Puttanna
S.N.Venkata Rao
High Land Suits
Hearing History
Judge: Honourable Dr.Justice A.D.MARIA CLETE
APPLICATION IN CIVIL SUITS
APPLICATION IN CIVIL SUITS
APPLICATION IN CIVIL SUITS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | APPLICATION IN CIVIL SUITS |
| 08-09-2026 | APPLICATION IN CIVIL SUITS |
| 08-06-2026 | APPLICATION IN CIVIL SUITS |
Orders
Case Summary: A/1069/2026 In this Madras High Court application dated 08-06-2026, the court directed parties to continue court-ordered mediation in the underlying civil suit (C.S.No.929 of 2015). The mediation had stalled due to the mediator's personal inconvenience, but both parties consented to resume with the same mediator. The court ordered parties to appear before the mediator as per the mediator's schedule and requested consideration of video conferencing for mediation sessions. The matter was adjourned and listed for 08-09-2026 under "Mediation referred cases." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: A/1069/2026 In this Madras High Court application dated 08-06-2026, the court directed parties to continue court-ordered mediation in the underlying civil suit (C.S.No.929 of 2015). The mediation had stalled due to the mediator's personal inconvenience, but both parties consented to resume with the same mediator. The court ordered parties to appear before the mediator as per the mediator's schedule and requested consideration of video conferencing for mediation sessions. The matter was adjourned and listed for 08-09-2026 under "Mediation referred cases." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts