RISHABH INFOPARK PRIVATE LTD., M/S K.RAVI, C.V.SHYAM SUNDAR,N.SENTHILKUMAR vs UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY THE — WP/26132/2007
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCMA010132512007
Filing Number
WP/80066/2007
Filing Date
27-Jul-2007
Registration No
WP/26132/2007
Registration Date
02-Aug-2007
Judge
Honourable Mr.Justice T. Vinod Kumar
Coram
Honourable Mr.Justice T. Vinod Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Service ( 140 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RISHABH INFOPARK PRIVATE LTD., M/S K.RAVI, C.V.SHYAM SUNDAR,N.SENTHILKUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY THE
-
2.THE CHAIRMAN
-
3.THE COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
04-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr.Justice T. Vinod KumarView PDF
Summary of WP/26132/2007: The writ petition challenging provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 regarding service tax on renting of immovable property was transferred to the Delhi High Court pursuant to Supreme Court orders consolidating similar challenges. The petition was heard and decided by the Delhi High Court, with matters now pending before the Supreme Court. The court directed the registry to delete the petition from its pendency list as it no longer exists on this court's file. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jan-2011
—
Honourable Ms Justice K. Suguna
-
01-Dec-2010
—
Honourable Mr Justice R. Sudhakar
-
16-Nov-2010
—
Honourable Mr Justice R. Sudhakar
-
04-Oct-2010
—
Honourable Mr Justice R. Sudhakar
-
22-Sep-2010
—
Honourable Mr Justice R. Sudhakar
-
16-Jun-2010
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jul-2007
Case filed
Registration No. WP/26132/2007
Summary of WP/26132/2007: The writ petition challenging provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 regarding service tax on renting of immovable property was transferred to the Delhi High Court pursuant to Supreme Court orders consolidating similar challenges. The petition was heard and decided by the Delhi High Court, with matters now pending before the Supreme Court. The court directed the registry to delete the petition from its pendency list as it no longer exists on this court's file. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts