Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs City Union Bank — TCA/55/2026

Case under U/s 260-a of the Income Tax Act,1961 Section 1. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

CNR: HCMA010130522026

Next Hearing

01st July 2026

e-Filing Number

16-01-2026

Filing Number

TCA/9470/2026

Filing Date

19-01-2026

Registration No

TCA/55/2026

Registration Date

28-04-2026

Judge

Honourable The CHIEF JUSTICE , Honourable Mr.Justice G.ARUL MURUGAN

Coram

Honourable The CHIEF JUSTICE , Honourable Mr.Justice G.ARUL MURUGAN

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

T.C. APPEAL/REVISION ( 170 )

Sub-Category

S. 260 (A) of I.T. Act, 1961 ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Acts & Sections

U/s 260-a of the Income Tax Act,1961 Section 1

Petitioner(s)

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax

Adv. V.Mahalingam,P.E.R. Mangala Suvigaran,P.E.R. Mangala Suvigaran, P.E.R. Mangala Suvigaran

Respondent(s)

City Union Bank

Hearing History

Judge: Honourable The CHIEF JUSTICE , Honourable Mr.Justice G.ARUL MURUGAN

02-06-2026

FOR ADMISSION (TCA)

01-07-2026

FOR ADMISSION (TCA)

Orders

02-06-2026
Honourable The CHIEF JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.ARUL MURUGAN

The Madras High Court admitted the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax's appeal against City Union Bank on two substantial questions of law: whether the ITAT erred in finding no error by the AO regarding disallowance of bad debt deductions under section 36(i)(vii), and whether the ITAT was justified in setting aside the PCIT's section 263 order without merit examination. Notice was issued to respondent, returnable in four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court admitted the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax's appeal against City Union Bank on two substantial questions of law: whether the ITAT erred in finding no error by the AO regarding disallowance of bad debt deductions under section 36(i)(vii), and whether the ITAT was justified in setting aside the PCIT's section 263 order without merit examination. Notice was issued to respondent, returnable in four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case