K.N. MARAPPASAMI (DIED), DHANALAKSHMI SARAVABHAUMAN ASSOCIATES, TR. GAYATHRI,FRANGKELIN S,ATCHAYA vs S.A. MUNUSAMY NAIDU (DIED) 1. S.M. LAKSHMI NARASIMMA — CRP/623/2024

Case under U/s 115 of C.p.c Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010120072024

Filing Number

CRP/8245/2024

Filing Date

22-Jan-2024

Registration No

CRP/623/2024

Registration Date

07-Feb-2024

Judge

Honourable Mrs.Justice T.v.thamilselvi

Coram

Honourable Mrs.Justice T.v.thamilselvi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Civil Revision Petition ( 166 )

Sub-Category

S. 115 of CPC ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 115 of C.p.c Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K.N. MARAPPASAMI (DIED), DHANALAKSHMI SARAVABHAUMAN ASSOCIATES, TR. GAYATHRI,FRANGKELIN S,ATCHAYA

  2. 2.SATHISH RAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S.A. MUNUSAMY NAIDU (DIED) 1. S.M. LAKSHMI NARASIMMA

    Adv. M. KARTHIK 1123

  2. 2.RENUKA DEVI

  3. 3.SASIKALA RANI

  4. 4.LALITHA DEVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mrs.Justice T.v.thamilselviView PDF

    Case Summary: CRP No. 623/2024 Decision: The Madras High Court dismissed the revision petition filed by judgment debtors seeking to stay execution proceedings. The court found that the judgment debtors had neglected pending second appeals for 12-15 years without obtaining any stay order, indicating weak defense. Since the original suit was filed in 1988 and the plaintiffs (senior citizens and rightful property owners) had waited decades for possession, the court allowed execution to proceed. As a humanitarian measure, the court directed plaintiffs to deposit ₹1,50,000 with the execution court within one week, allowing judgment debtors to withdraw it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2024

    For Admission (Crp)

    Honourable Mr Justice V.sivagnanam

  4. 06-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 22-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRP/623/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRP No. 623/2024 Decision: The Madras High Court dismissed the revision petition filed by judgment debtors seeking to stay execution proceedings. The court found that the judgment debtors had neglected pending second appeals for 12-15 years without obtaining any stay order, indicating weak defense. Since the original suit was filed in 1988 and the plaintiffs (senior citizens and rightful property owners) had waited decades for possession, the court allowed execution to proceed. As a humanitarian measure, the court directed plaintiffs to deposit ₹1,50,000 with the execution court within one week, allowing judgment debtors to withdraw it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case