P. Hary Mathew M/S.S.KINGSTON JEROLD, P. RAMKUMAR,A. DIVINE ROJER, Y.S.RANJEETHA,D. HARI KRISHNAN,M. SATHYAMOORTHY, J. AKASH,H. RADHA KRISHNAN,RHEEFNA JEROLD, S. SABARISH vs P.John Bosco — CMP/5095/2026

Case under U/s 5 Limitation Act Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DELAY CONDONED on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010115852026

Filing Number

CMP/8405/2026

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

CMP/5095/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Judge

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Coram

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Electricity ( 56 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DELAY CONDONED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 5 Limitation Act Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P. Hary Mathew M/S.S.KINGSTON JEROLD, P. RAMKUMAR,A. DIVINE ROJER, Y.S.RANJEETHA,D. HARI KRISHNAN,M. SATHYAMOORTHY, J. AKASH,H. RADHA KRISHNAN,RHEEFNA JEROLD, S. SABARISH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.P.John Bosco

  2. 2.The Chairman

  3. 3.The Assistant Engineer ( Thousand Light)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Honourable The Chief JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul MuruganView PDF

    Case Summary: CMP No.5095/2026 The Madras High Court allowed an application to condone a 10-day delay in filing an appeal, finding the reasons provided in the affidavit satisfactory. The Registry was directed to number the appeal and list it for admission if otherwise in order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Miscellaneous Petitions

    Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

  4. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/5095/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMP No.5095/2026 The Madras High Court allowed an application to condone a 10-day delay in filing an appeal, finding the reasons provided in the affidavit satisfactory. The Registry was directed to number the appeal and list it for admission if otherwise in order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case