Sankar S.MAGESHKUMAR, m.sarath kumar,r.udaya kumar vs Sheshachalam — SA/364/2026

Case under U/s 100 of C.p.c Section 1. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCMA010111682026

Filing Number

SA/8130/2026

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

SA/364/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Suits ( 149 )

Sub-Category

Permanent Injunction ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 100 of C.p.c Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sankar S.MAGESHKUMAR, m.sarath kumar,r.udaya kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sheshachalam

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice S. SountharView PDF

    The Second Appeal was admitted on the substantial question of law regarding whether the appellant/plaintiff is entitled to limited injunction restraining the respondent from interfering with his possession when a tenancy agreement has expired. Notice issued to respondent returnable in six weeks, records called from lower courts, and matter listed for hearing after six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar

  4. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/364/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Second Appeal was admitted on the substantial question of law regarding whether the appellant/plaintiff is entitled to limited injunction restraining the respondent from interfering with his possession when a tenancy agreement has expired. Notice issued to respondent returnable in six weeks, records called from lower courts, and matter listed for hearing after six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case