M/s.SAFA GLOBAL IMPEX, ZAFFARULLAH KHAN, A.MOHAMMED RAASHIDH,T.Magendiran,S.Hussain Afroze vs Union Bank of India, — CRP/2984/2026
Case under U/a 227 Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA010109122026
Filing Number
CRP/7968/2026
Filing Date
12-Jan-2026
Registration No
CRP/2984/2026
Registration Date
09-May-2026
Judge
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
Coram
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
Civil Revision Petition ( 166 )
Sub-Category
Article 227 of the Constitution of India ( 44 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIALSECTION
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s.SAFA GLOBAL IMPEX, ZAFFARULLAH KHAN, A.MOHAMMED RAASHIDH,T.Magendiran,S.Hussain Afroze
Respondent(s)
-
1.Union Bank of India,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Honourable The Chief JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul MuruganView PDF
Case Summary: The Madras High Court dismissed SAFA Global Impex's revision petition seeking directions to expedite disposal of appeal S.A.No.421 of 2023 pending before the Debt Recovery Tribunal-II. The court held that expediting a specific case out of turn would disrupt tribunal operations and disadvantage other litigants, finding no exceptional circumstances warranting such intervention. The court permitted the petitioner to file appropriate applications directly before the tribunal to seek expedited hearing based on genuine urgency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
For Admission (Crp)
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
-
12-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRP/2984/2026
Case Summary: The Madras High Court dismissed SAFA Global Impex's revision petition seeking directions to expedite disposal of appeal S.A.No.421 of 2023 pending before the Debt Recovery Tribunal-II. The court held that expediting a specific case out of turn would disrupt tribunal operations and disadvantage other litigants, finding no exceptional circumstances warranting such intervention. The court permitted the petitioner to file appropriate applications directly before the tribunal to seek expedited hearing based on genuine urgency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts