S Kalavathy DEVI N, m.mohamed sakeel,r.n.roshan sri hari,p.madhurya,m.siva prakash,r.deepika,g.gayathri vs N Geethanjali Advocate - K.S.Karthik Raja, h.geetha for caveator ,g.kirubakaran,R.Venkatraman,M.Senthil Kumaran — CRP/1810/2026

Case under U/s 115 of C.p.c Section 115. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010101102026

e-Filing Number

10-01-2026

Filing Number

CRP/7400/2026

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRP/1810/2026

Registration Date

25-Mar-2026

Judge

Honourable Mrs.Justice N. Mala

Coram

Honourable Mrs.Justice N. Mala

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Civil Revision Petition ( 166 )

Sub-Category

S. 115 of CPC ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 115 of C.p.c Section 115

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S Kalavathy DEVI N, m.mohamed sakeel,r.n.roshan sri hari,p.madhurya,m.siva prakash,r.deepika,g.gayathri

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.N Geethanjali Advocate - K.S.Karthik Raja, h.geetha for caveator ,g.kirubakaran,R.Venkatraman,M.Senthil Kumaran

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mrs.Justice N. MalaView PDF

    The Madras High Court allowed the civil revision petition and set aside the trial court's order rejecting the petitioner's application to condone a 162-day delay in filing to set aside an ex parte decree in a partition suit. The court found the petitioner's medical reasons (serious health conditions documented by medical certificates) to be genuine and bona fide, unlike the trial court which had rejected them for lack of supporting evidence. The petitioner, a 63-year-old senior citizen, was required to pay ₹5,000 cost to the respondent's counsel within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mrs.Justice N. Mala

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Honourable Mrs.Justice N. MalaView PDF

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRP/1810/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court allowed the civil revision petition and set aside the trial court's order rejecting the petitioner's application to condone a 162-day delay in filing to set aside an ex parte decree in a partition suit. The court found the petitioner's medical reasons (serious health conditions documented by medical certificates) to be genuine and bona fide, unlike the trial court which had rejected them for lack of supporting evidence. The petitioner, a 63-year-old senior citizen, was required to pay ₹5,000 cost to the respondent's counsel within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case