Tvl.Rajalakshmi Traders M.BALASUBRAMANIAN, D.SHANTHOSH vs The State Tax Officer, — WP/19725/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010069862026

e-Filing Number

29-12-2025

Filing Number

WP/5159/2026

Filing Date

29-Dec-2025

Registration No

WP/19725/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Tvl.Rajalakshmi Traders M.BALASUBRAMANIAN, D.SHANTHOSH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Tax Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    The writ petition filed by Tvl. Rajalakshmi Traders against the State Tax Officer, Koyambedu, seeking to quash a GSTN assessment order dated 10.02.2025, was dismissed on 15-06-2026. The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution because the petitioner's counsel failed to appear at the hearing on 09.06.2026 and remained unrepresented at the final hearing, resulting in dismissal without any order as to costs. The connected miscellaneous petitions were also closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 29-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19725/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The writ petition filed by Tvl. Rajalakshmi Traders against the State Tax Officer, Koyambedu, seeking to quash a GSTN assessment order dated 10.02.2025, was dismissed on 15-06-2026. The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution because the petitioner's counsel failed to appear at the hearing on 09.06.2026 and remained unrepresented at the final hearing, resulting in dismissal without any order as to costs. The connected miscellaneous petitions were also closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case