M/s.Barath Electricals GOVARTHANAN G, R.Muthu krishnan,N.Rajarajan vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST) — WP/18826/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010056732026

e-Filing Number

06-01-2026

Filing Number

WP/4134/2026

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

WP/18826/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s.Barath Electricals GOVARTHANAN G, R.Muthu krishnan,N.Rajarajan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Assistant Commissioner (ST)

  2. 2.The Deputy commisioner (GST)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Summary of WP No. 18826 of 2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST tax demand order dated 21.08.2024 issued against M/s. Barath Electricals because it was passed without hearing the petitioner, violating procedural fairness. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration with proper opportunity for hearing, conditional on the petitioner remitting 50% of the disputed tax within thirty days, with a fresh order to be issued within three months thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/18826/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP No. 18826 of 2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST tax demand order dated 21.08.2024 issued against M/s. Barath Electricals because it was passed without hearing the petitioner, violating procedural fairness. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration with proper opportunity for hearing, conditional on the petitioner remitting 50% of the disputed tax within thirty days, with a fresh order to be issued within three months thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case