The DGM (T) And Project Director S.SRINIVASAN vs The District Collector And Sole Arbitrator (LA) — CMP/12613/2026

Case under U/o Iv Rule 9(4) of as Rules Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DELAY CONDONED on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010041682026

Filing Number

CMP/3020/2026

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

CMP/12613/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan , Honourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan , Honourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi

Bench Type

Division Bench

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DELAY CONDONED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o Iv Rule 9(4) of as Rules Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The DGM (T) And Project Director S.SRINIVASAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The District Collector And Sole Arbitrator (LA)

  2. 2.THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND

  3. 3.Shri.P.Rangaraj,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice P. VELMURUGAN,Honourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan ThilakavadiView PDF

    The court granted the petitioner's miscellaneous petition to condone a 555-day delay in re-presenting appeal papers in Arbitration Appeal SR.No.214134 of 2025. Being satisfied with the affidavit's averments, the court allowed the delay and directed the Registry to number the appeal if otherwise in order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    To Condone Delay In Representation

    Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan , Honourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi

  4. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/12613/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the petitioner's miscellaneous petition to condone a 555-day delay in re-presenting appeal papers in Arbitration Appeal SR.No.214134 of 2025. Being satisfied with the affidavit's averments, the court allowed the delay and directed the Registry to number the appeal if otherwise in order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case