FR.ANI JOHN vs ST.MARY’S ORTHODOX SYRIAN CHURCH Advocate - ROSHEN.D.ALEXANDER, ,TINA ALEX THOMAS,HARIMOHAN,ROSHEN.D.ALEXANDER,S.SREEKUMAR (SR.) — Con.APP(C) /12/2024

Case under Kerala High Court Act, 1958 Section SECTION 19 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 READ WITH SECTION 5 OF THE KERALA HIGH COUR ACT, 1958. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

CNR: KLHC011381682024

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

25th September 2024

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

Con.APP(C) /11/2024

Filing Date

10-09-2024

Registration No

Con.APP(C) /12/2024

Registration Date

10-09-2024

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN , HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALEE KRISHNA S.

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN , HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALEE KRISHNA S.

Bench Type

Division

Category

23.01 Contempt Appeal(C) ( 85 )

Sub-Category

( 1415 )

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

KERALA HIGH COURT ACT, 1958 Section SECTION 19 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 READ WITH SECTION 5 OF THE KERALA HIGH COUR ACT, 1958

Petitioner(s)

FR.ANI JOHN

Adv. SAJAN VARGHEESE K., ,LIJU. M.P

T.C.GEEVARGHESE

ABRAHAM SCARIA

Respondent(s)

ST.MARY’S ORTHODOX SYRIAN CHURCH Advocate - ROSHEN.D.ALEXANDER, ,TINA ALEX THOMAS,HARIMOHAN,ROSHEN.D.ALEXANDER,S.SREEKUMAR (SR.)

FR. MATHAI THOZHUTHUNGAL

Adv. ROSHEN D. ALEXANDER,TINA ALEX THOMAS(K/000532/

HARIMOHAN(K/000327/

ROSHEN D. ALEXANDER S.SREEKUMAR (SR.)(S-

DR. VENU V

Adv. ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA,SHRI.ASOK M.CHERIAN, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL() ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA T.S.SHYAM PRASANTH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER()

BISWANATH SINHA

Adv. ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA,SHRI.ASOK M.CHERIAN, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL() ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA T.S.SHYAM PRASANTH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER()

SHEIKH DARVESH SAHIB

Adv. ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA,SHRI.ASOK M.CHERIAN, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL() ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA T.S.SHYAM PRASANTH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER()

DR. CHITHRA

Adv. ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA,SHRI.ASOK M.CHERIAN, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL() ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA T.S.SHYAM PRASANTH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER()

R. AANAD

Adv. ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA,SHRI.ASOK M.CHERIAN, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL() ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA T.S.SHYAM PRASANTH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER()

DR. AMRUTHAVALLI P

Adv. ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA,SHRI.ASOK M.CHERIAN, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL() ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA T.S.SHYAM PRASANTH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER()

CR SANTHOSH

Adv. ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA,SHRI.ASOK M.CHERIAN, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL() ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA T.S.SHYAM PRASANTH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER()

BENNY KP

Adv. ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA,SHRI.ASOK M.CHERIAN, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL() ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA T.S.SHYAM PRASANTH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER()

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN , HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALEE KRISHNA S.

24-03-2026

FOR JUDGEMENT

23-03-2026

FOR ORDERS

23-03-2026

FOR ORDERS

06-03-2026

FOR JUDGEMENT

06-03-2026

FOR JUDGEMENT

Orders

25-09-2024

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR

17-10-2024

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR

17-10-2024

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR

17-10-2024

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR

17-10-2024

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR

17-10-2024
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR

Summary of Court Decision The Kerala High Court's Division Bench dismissed multiple contempt appeals challenging directions for District Collectors to take over possession of five disputed Orthodox Syrian churches. The court held that while contempt proceedings must follow statutory procedure, courts retain inherent power to pass orders ensuring judgment implementation and preventing contemnors from benefiting from their violations—rejecting arguments that such positive directions exceed contempt jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

01-10-2024

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR

13-03-2025

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALEE KRISHNA S.

03-04-2025

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALEE KRISHNA S.

29-05-2025

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. V. BALAKRISHNAN

23-07-2025

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALEE KRISHNA S.

08-08-2025

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALEE KRISHNA S.

08-08-2025

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALEE KRISHNA S.

13-08-2025

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALEE KRISHNA S.

18-09-2025

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALEE KRISHNA S.

24-03-2026

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALEE KRISHNA S.

24-03-2026

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALEE KRISHNA S.

24-03-2026

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALEE KRISHNA S.

26-03-2026

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALEE KRISHNA S.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Decision The Kerala High Court's Division Bench dismissed multiple contempt appeals challenging directions for District Collectors to take over possession of five disputed Orthodox Syrian churches. The court held that while contempt proceedings must follow statutory procedure, courts retain inherent power to pass orders ensuring judgment implementation and preventing contemnors from benefiting from their violations—rejecting arguments that such positive directions exceed contempt jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case