C.SHINOJ vs STATE OF KERALA — Crl.Rev.Pet/393/2019

Case under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 397-401. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 22-Mar-2019

CNR: KLHC010222542019

Filing Number

Crl.Rev.Pet/6048/2019

Filing Date

21-Mar-2019

Registration No

Crl.Rev.Pet/393/2019

Registration Date

21-Mar-2019

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice G.girish

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice G.girish

Bench Type

Single

Category

25.00 Criminal Revision Petition ( 97 )

Sub-Category

156.110 SEC.326 I.P.C. ( 2042 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL SECTION

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 397-401

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.C.SHINOJ

    Adv. S.RAJEEV,SRI.K.ANAND (A-

  2. 2.,SRI.K.ANAND (A-

  3. 3., ,K.K.DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN,V.VINAY,D.FEROZE,ANAND KALYANAKRISHNAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF KERALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice G.girish

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    For Disposal

    Honourable Mr. Justice G.girish

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice G.girish

  5. 21-May-2019

    Petitions

    Honourable Mr.justice V.g.arun

  6. 22-Mar-2019

    Honourable Mr. Justice Raja Vijayaraghavan VView PDF

    The High Court of Kerala rejected the petitioner's application for suspension of sentence, finding that the petitioner had not made out a sufficient case for such relief at that stage. The court directed the Registry to call for Lower Court Records and allowed the petitioner to file a fresh application after the records are received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 22-Mar-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 21-Mar-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.Rev.Pet/393/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Kerala rejected the petitioner's application for suspension of sentence, finding that the petitioner had not made out a sufficient case for such relief at that stage. The court directed the Registry to call for Lower Court Records and allowed the petitioner to file a fresh application after the records are received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case