THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER vs SHARANAPPA S/O MADIWALAPPA AND ORS — MFA/201023/2021

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 173(1). Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: KAHC030276162021

Filing Number

MFA/200653/2021

Filing Date

14-Jun-2021

Registration No

MFA/201023/2021

Registration Date

30-Aug-2021

Judge

K V Aravind

Coram

K V Aravind

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MFA ( 124 )

Sub-Category

IA-Insurance Appeal ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 173(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER

    Adv. MANVENDRA REDDY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHARANAPPA S/O MADIWALAPPA AND ORS

  2. 2.RAMESH S/O SHARANAPPA

  3. 3.DEVAMMA D/O SHARANAPPA

  4. 4.RANGANATH S/O AMANNA DORE

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    K V AravindView PDF

    Summary of MFA No. 201023/2021 The appeal was adjourned with conditional orders. The court granted the appellant's counsel until end of day to cure defects in the process memo (missing covers, acknowledgments, and appeal papers), failing which the appeal would be dismissed against respondents 1 and 4. Additionally, two weeks' time was granted to produce the deposit acknowledgement. The court issued strict procedural directives against partial compliance with process fee requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Orders

    K V Aravind

  4. 31-Aug-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 14-Jun-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. MFA/201023/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of MFA No. 201023/2021 The appeal was adjourned with conditional orders. The court granted the appellant's counsel until end of day to cure defects in the process memo (missing covers, acknowledgments, and appeal papers), failing which the appeal would be dismissed against respondents 1 and 4. Additionally, two weeks' time was granted to produce the deposit acknowledgement. The court issued strict procedural directives against partial compliance with process fee requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case