MAHIBOOBSHA @ MAHIBOOB vs SHANTABAI — MFA/207502/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 173(1). Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: KAHC030145662025

Filing Number

MFA/206174/2025

Filing Date

11-Nov-2025

Registration No

MFA/207502/2025

Registration Date

17-Dec-2025

Judge

K V Aravind

Coram

K V Aravind

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MFA ( 124 )

Sub-Category

CA-Claimants Appeal ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 173(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHIBOOBSHA @ MAHIBOOB

    Adv. NAGARAJ PATIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHANTABAI

  2. 2.RAMLU

  3. 3.THE RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO., LTD,

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    K V AravindView PDF

    Case Summary: MFA No. 207502/2025 In this motor vehicle appeal before the Karnataka High Court at Kalaburagi, Justice K V Aravind allowed the appellant's application seeking condonation of a 47-day delay in filing the appeal, accepting the cause shown. Notice to respondents No. 1 and 2 was dispensed with at the appellant's request. The matter was subsequently referred to Lok Aadalath for settlement/mediation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 3Rd Time

    Additional Registrar Judicial

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 2Nd Time

    Additional Registrar Judicial

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 1St Time

    Additional Registrar Judicial

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. MFA/207502/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MFA No. 207502/2025 In this motor vehicle appeal before the Karnataka High Court at Kalaburagi, Justice K V Aravind allowed the appellant's application seeking condonation of a 47-day delay in filing the appeal, accepting the cause shown. Notice to respondents No. 1 and 2 was dispensed with at the appellant's request. The matter was subsequently referred to Lok Aadalath for settlement/mediation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case