SANTOSH vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — CRL.P/201470/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code1 Section 379. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed for Non-Prosecution on 09th April 2026.
CNR: KAHC030111332025
Filing Number
CRL.P/201368/2025
Filing Date
29-08-2025
Registration No
CRL.P/201470/2025
Registration Date
26-09-2025
Judge
G BASAVARAJA
Coram
G BASAVARAJA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRL.P ( 112 )
Sub-Category
482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)-U/S 482/-U/S 528 ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANTOSH
Adv. SYED MASTAN
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Hearing History
Judge: G BASAVARAJA
NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 1ST TIME
ADMISSION
ADMISSION
NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 5TH TIME
NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 3RD TIME
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-10-2025 | NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 1ST TIME |
| 09-04-2026 | ADMISSION |
| 13-03-2026 | ADMISSION |
| 09-02-2026 | NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 5TH TIME |
| 30-01-2026 | NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 3RD TIME |
Orders
The Karnataka High Court (Kalaburagi Bench) dismissed Criminal Petition No. 201470 of 2025 filed by Santosh S/O Suresh Lahoti, who sought to quash an FIR, charge sheet, and proceedings under Section 379 IPC arising from Crime No. 12/2020 of University Police Station, Kalaburagi. The petition was dismissed for default and non-prosecution as the petitioner remained absent during the hearing with no legal representation, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Karnataka High Court (Kalaburagi Bench) dismissed Criminal Petition No. 201470 of 2025 filed by Santosh S/O Suresh Lahoti, who sought to quash an FIR, charge sheet, and proceedings under Section 379 IPC arising from Crime No. 12/2020 of University Police Station, Kalaburagi. The petition was dismissed for default and non-prosecution as the petitioner remained absent during the hearing with no legal representation, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts