THE CHIEF ENGINEER AND ANR vs GANGAPPA S/O HULLEPPA AND ORS — MSA/200651/2022

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 54 (2). Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: KAHC030067242022

Filing Number

MSA/200135/2022

Filing Date

01-Sep-2022

Registration No

MSA/200651/2022

Registration Date

19-Dec-2022

Judge

K V Aravind

Coram

K V Aravind

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MSA ( 126 )

Sub-Category

LA-U/s 55(2) of Land Acquisition Act ( 75 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 54 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE CHIEF ENGINEER AND ANR

    Adv. SUDARSHAN M

  2. 2.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GANGAPPA S/O HULLEPPA AND ORS

  2. 2.PRAVEEN S/O BHUTALI POOJARI

  3. 3.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

  4. 4.THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    K V AravindView PDF

    Summary of MSA 200651/2022: The High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi issued an oral order on 12.06.2026 in the connected appeals. In MSA 200612/2022, the Court directed necessary action within one week regarding deceased respondent No.1; failure would result in the appeal being abated against that respondent. In MSA 200642/2022, 200645/2022, 200647/2022, and 200650/2022, the Court directed service of unserved respondents within one week; failure would result in dismissal of those appeals against unserved respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Orders

    K V Aravind

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    Orders

    Tyagaraja N. Inavally

  5. 01-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 01-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. MSA/200651/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of MSA 200651/2022: The High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi issued an oral order on 12.06.2026 in the connected appeals. In MSA 200612/2022, the Court directed necessary action within one week regarding deceased respondent No.1; failure would result in the appeal being abated against that respondent. In MSA 200642/2022, 200645/2022, 200647/2022, and 200650/2022, the Court directed service of unserved respondents within one week; failure would result in dismissal of those appeals against unserved respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case