SRI HUSSAIN SAB vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — WP/202214/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: KAHC030062422026

Filing Number

WP/202022/2026

Filing Date

12-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/202214/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

K V Aravind

Coram

K V Aravind

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 144 )

Sub-Category

WAKF-Wakf Act ( 27 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI HUSSAIN SAB

    Adv. ARUNKUMAR AMARGUNDAPPA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

  2. 2.THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF AUQAF

  3. 3.THE DIVISIONAL WAQF OFFICER

  4. 4.THE WAKF OFFICER

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    K V AravindView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 202214/2026 The High Court of Karnataka granted Sri Hussain Sab an interim order permitting him to perform Moharram 2026 religious rituals and ceremonies at Hussaini Alam Ashurkhana in Raichur District, subject to guidance and supervision by the Divisional Wakf Officer. The petitioner must hand over all gold, silver, and institution keys to the Wakf Board immediately after the festival. The court deferred final consideration of a competing claim by an impleading applicant who previously served as hereditary Mutawalli. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Preliminary Hearing

    K V Aravind

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Preliminary Hearing

    S.r.krishna Kumar

  5. 12-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/202214/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 202214/2026 The High Court of Karnataka granted Sri Hussain Sab an interim order permitting him to perform Moharram 2026 religious rituals and ceremonies at Hussaini Alam Ashurkhana in Raichur District, subject to guidance and supervision by the Divisional Wakf Officer. The petitioner must hand over all gold, silver, and institution keys to the Wakf Board immediately after the festival. The court deferred final consideration of a competing claim by an impleading applicant who previously served as hereditary Mutawalli. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case