AJJU @ AJIM @ MD AZARODDIN vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — CRL.P/200930/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code1 Section 269,270,284,336,468,476,420,34. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed for Non-Prosecution on 09th April 2026.

CNR: KAHC030053172025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CRL.P/200784/2025

Filing Date

15-04-2025

Registration No

CRL.P/200930/2025

Registration Date

02-06-2025

Judge

G BASAVARAJA

Coram

G BASAVARAJA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRL.P ( 112 )

Sub-Category

482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)-U/S 482/-U/S 528 ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code1 Section 269,270,284,336,468,476,420,34

Petitioner(s)

AJJU @ AJIM @ MD AZARODDIN

Adv. DEVARAJA

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

GURULINGAPPA M PATIL

Hearing History

Judge: G BASAVARAJA

16-06-2025

NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 1ST TIME

09-04-2026

ORDERS

16-02-2026

NON-FURNISHING OF FPF, C/A, ETC TO ISSUE NOTICE FOR 3RD TIME

09-02-2026

NON-FURNISHING OF FPF, C/A, ETC TO ISSUE NOTICE FOR 2ND TIME

09-09-2025

NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 4TH TIME

Orders

09-04-2026
G BASAVARAJA

The High Court of Karnataka dismissed Criminal Petition No. 200930 of 2025 filed by Ajju @ Ajim @ MD Azaroddin, who sought to quash an FIR (Crime No. 212/2023) registered at Humnabad Police Station for violations under the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003 and various IPC sections. The court dismissed the petition for default and non-prosecution because the petitioner failed to appear and was not represented during the hearing, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Karnataka dismissed Criminal Petition No. 200930 of 2025 filed by Ajju @ Ajim @ MD Azaroddin, who sought to quash an FIR (Crime No. 212/2023) registered at Humnabad Police Station for violations under the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003 and various IPC sections. The court dismissed the petition for default and non-prosecution because the petitioner failed to appear and was not represented during the hearing, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case