SRI BANDEPPA vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — WPHC/200006/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 08th June 2026.
CNR: KAHC030046312026
Filing Number
WPHC/200006/2026
Filing Date
16-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPHC/200006/2026
Registration Date
16-Apr-2026
Judge
R.devdas , Brungesh M
Coram
R.devdas , Brungesh M
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WPHC ( 146 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
08-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRI BANDEPPA
Adv. SHIVANAND V. PATTANSHETTI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
-
2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
-
3.THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
-
4.THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
-
5.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
-
6.RAJKUMAR S/O BALAPPA PANDRE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Jun-2026
R.devdas,brungesh MView PDF
The court closed the habeas corpus petition after police produced the petitioner's missing daughter, Smt. Priyanka (27), before it. The court found that although her parents had arranged her marriage against her will, she stated she did not wish to return to them. The court ordered her placement in a Women's Welfare Center under the Women and Child Welfare Department, Vijayapura, with directions for proper medical care given her pregnancy, while reserving liberty for her to seek further orders if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
Orders
Suraj Govindaraj , Chillakur Sumalatha
-
27-Apr-2026
Orders
Suraj Govindaraj , Chillakur Sumalatha
-
17-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPHC/200006/2026
The court closed the habeas corpus petition after police produced the petitioner's missing daughter, Smt. Priyanka (27), before it. The court found that although her parents had arranged her marriage against her will, she stated she did not wish to return to them. The court ordered her placement in a Women's Welfare Center under the Women and Child Welfare Department, Vijayapura, with directions for proper medical care given her pregnancy, while reserving liberty for her to seek further orders if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts