RAJENDRA vs SANGRAM — CRL.P/200524/2026

Case under The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC030041052026

Filing Number

CRL.P/200512/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRL.P/200524/2026

Registration Date

16-Apr-2026

Judge

G Basavaraja

Coram

G Basavaraja

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRL.P ( 112 )

Sub-Category

482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)-U/S 482/-U/S 528 ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRA

    Adv. SANTOSH KUMAR B BIRADAR

  2. 2.SMT ANITA W/O RAJENDRA GAYAKWAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANGRAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    G BasavarajaView PDF

    Summary of CRL.P 200524/2026: The Karnataka High Court (Kalaburagi Bench) modified the trial court's order requiring petitioners Rajendra and Anita Gayakwad to deposit 20% of the fine amount (Rs. 1,90,000) as a condition for sentence suspension. While the court upheld the deposit requirement, it prohibited disbursement to the respondent and mandated the amount be held in a fixed deposit in the court's name at a nationalized bank for one year under auto-renewal, pending resolution of the underlying criminal appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Admission

    G Basavaraja

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRL.P/200524/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRL.P 200524/2026: The Karnataka High Court (Kalaburagi Bench) modified the trial court's order requiring petitioners Rajendra and Anita Gayakwad to deposit 20% of the fine amount (Rs. 1,90,000) as a condition for sentence suspension. While the court upheld the deposit requirement, it prohibited disbursement to the respondent and mandated the amount be held in a fixed deposit in the court's name at a nationalized bank for one year under auto-renewal, pending resolution of the underlying criminal appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case