RAMESH vs THE STATE — CRL.P/200476/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code1 Section 420, 465, 468,471,120(B). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.

CNR: KAHC030040682026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CRL.P/200504/2026

Filing Date

02-04-2026

Registration No

CRL.P/200476/2026

Registration Date

04-04-2026

Judge

G BASAVARAJA

Coram

G BASAVARAJA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRL.P ( 112 )

Sub-Category

438(Cr.PC)/482(BNSS)-U/S 438/-U/S 482 ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code1 Section 420, 465, 468,471,120(B)

Petitioner(s)

RAMESH

Adv. AVINASH A UPLAONKAR

Respondent(s)

THE STATE

Hearing History

Judge: G BASAVARAJA

06-04-2026

ORDERS -1ST TIME MATTERS

09-04-2026

ORDERS -1ST TIME MATTERS

Orders

09-04-2026
G BASAVARAJA

Summary The Karnataka High Court allowed the bail petition of Ramesh S/O Nagappa Talwar, accused of cheating, forgery, and criminal conspiracy (IPC Sections 420, 465, 468, 471, and 120(B)). The court granted bail on the principle of parity, noting that the District Sessions Judge had previously granted anticipatory bail in similar cases, though the trial court had rejected his application. The petitioner must execute a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with one surety and comply with conditions including non-interference with witnesses and abstaining from similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Karnataka High Court allowed the bail petition of Ramesh S/O Nagappa Talwar, accused of cheating, forgery, and criminal conspiracy (IPC Sections 420, 465, 468, 471, and 120(B)). The court granted bail on the principle of parity, noting that the District Sessions Judge had previously granted anticipatory bail in similar cases, though the trial court had rejected his application. The petitioner must execute a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with one surety and comply with conditions including non-interference with witnesses and abstaining from similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case