SHIVU KUMAR KUMBAR vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — CRL.A/200115/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita(bns), 2023 Section 64(2)(M), 352, 351(2), 115(2), 3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.
CNR: KAHC030040392026
Filing Number
CRL.A/200126/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRL.A/200115/2026
Registration Date
04-Apr-2026
Judge
G Basavaraja
Coram
G Basavaraja
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRL.A ( 110 )
Sub-Category
U/S 14 (A)- (2) of SC and ST ACT ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHIVU KUMAR KUMBAR
Adv. MAHANTESH PATIL
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
-
2.KUMARI MAMATHA D/O RAVI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Apr-2026
Orders
G Basavaraja
-
17-Apr-2026
G BasavarajaView PDF
Case Summary: CRL.A 200115/2026 The Karnataka High Court allowed Shivu Kumar Kumbar's appeal and granted him bail in a case involving charges under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and BNS sections. The court set aside the lower court's bail rejection order, finding that since the investigation was completed and the charge-sheet filed, the accused was not required for further interrogation. Given that the offences were not punishable by death or life imprisonment, the court deemed bail appropriate, imposing conditions including a Rs. 1,00,000 personal bond, non-interference with witnesses, and mandatory court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Orders
G Basavaraja
-
10-Apr-2026
Orders -1St Time Matters
G Basavaraja
-
06-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRL.A/200115/2026
Case Summary: CRL.A 200115/2026 The Karnataka High Court allowed Shivu Kumar Kumbar's appeal and granted him bail in a case involving charges under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and BNS sections. The court set aside the lower court's bail rejection order, finding that since the investigation was completed and the charge-sheet filed, the accused was not required for further interrogation. Given that the offences were not punishable by death or life imprisonment, the court deemed bail appropriate, imposing conditions including a Rs. 1,00,000 personal bond, non-interference with witnesses, and mandatory court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts