SHIVU KUMAR KUMBAR vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — CRL.A/200115/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita(bns), 2023 Section 64(2)(M), 352, 351(2), 115(2), 3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.

CNR: KAHC030040392026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CRL.A/200126/2026

Filing Date

01-04-2026

Registration No

CRL.A/200115/2026

Registration Date

04-04-2026

Judge

G BASAVARAJA

Coram

G BASAVARAJA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRL.A ( 110 )

Sub-Category

U/S 14 (A)- (2) of SC and ST ACT ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita(bns), 2023 Section 64(2)(M), 352, 351(2), 115(2), 3(5)
Sc/st Pa New Act-2015 Section 3(10(R), 3(1)(S), 3(1)(W)(I), 3(2)(V0

Petitioner(s)

SHIVU KUMAR KUMBAR

Adv. MAHANTESH PATIL

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

KUMARI MAMATHA D/O RAVI

Hearing History

Judge: G BASAVARAJA

06-04-2026

ORDERS -1ST TIME MATTERS

23-04-2026

ORDERS

17-04-2026

ORDERS

10-04-2026

ORDERS -1ST TIME MATTERS

Orders

17-04-2026
G BASAVARAJA

Case Summary: CRL.A 200115/2026 The Karnataka High Court allowed Shivu Kumar Kumbar's appeal and granted him bail in a case involving charges under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and BNS sections. The court set aside the lower court's bail rejection order, finding that since the investigation was completed and the charge-sheet filed, the accused was not required for further interrogation. Given that the offences were not punishable by death or life imprisonment, the court deemed bail appropriate, imposing conditions including a Rs. 1,00,000 personal bond, non-interference with witnesses, and mandatory court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRL.A 200115/2026 The Karnataka High Court allowed Shivu Kumar Kumbar's appeal and granted him bail in a case involving charges under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and BNS sections. The court set aside the lower court's bail rejection order, finding that since the investigation was completed and the charge-sheet filed, the accused was not required for further interrogation. Given that the offences were not punishable by death or life imprisonment, the court deemed bail appropriate, imposing conditions including a Rs. 1,00,000 personal bond, non-interference with witnesses, and mandatory court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case