SHIVAKUMAR vs THE STATE OF KARNATKA — CRL.P/200479/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita(bns), 2023 Section 103(1),351(2),351(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC030038172026

Filing Number

CRL.P/200475/2026

Filing Date

26-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRL.P/200479/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

G Basavaraja

Coram

G Basavaraja

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRL.P ( 112 )

Sub-Category

439(Cr.PC)/483(BNSS)-U/S 439/-U/S 483 ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita(bns), 2023 Section 103(1),351(2),351(3),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHIVAKUMAR

    Adv. CHAITANYAKUMAR CHANDRIKI

  2. 2.VEERESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF KARNATKA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    G BasavarajaView PDF

    The High Court of Karnataka granted bail to two accused (Shivakumar and Veeresh) in a case involving charges under Sections 103(1), 351(2), 351(3) read with Section 3(5) of BNSS, 2023, finding that material prosecution witnesses did not support the case and there was insufficient evidence to connect the accused to the alleged offences. The court imposed conditions including personal bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 each with surety, regular court appearances, and prohibition against witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Orders -1St Time Matters

    G Basavaraja

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRL.P/200479/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Karnataka granted bail to two accused (Shivakumar and Veeresh) in a case involving charges under Sections 103(1), 351(2), 351(3) read with Section 3(5) of BNSS, 2023, finding that material prosecution witnesses did not support the case and there was insufficient evidence to connect the accused to the alleged offences. The court imposed conditions including personal bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 each with surety, regular court appearances, and prohibition against witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case